Update: Annexation Bills Pass House, Go to Senate

The annexation effort is going through the state legislature.

Update: The Georgia House approved the annexation bills on Tuesday morning.

The legislation next goes to the Georgia Senate. Since it's local legislation, it needs four signatures to pass, said state Rep. Karla Drenner, one of the co-sponsors.

The previous story:

A new effort has been mounted in the legislature to allow Decatur and Avondale Estates to annex the strip of unincorporated land between the two cities.

State Reps. Stephanie Benfield and Karla Drenner submitted bills that would allow Decatur to annex commercial parts of the land along College Avenue up to Sams Crossing. Residential areas would not be annexed.

Avondale Estates could annex the land up to Sams Crossing on its side of the road. The two cities would then share a common border.

But one property owner in the unincorporated area, Charles Blalock, said Wednesday he and others will fight the effort. Blalock said the owners would meet Thursday afternoon to come up with a plan of attack.

He said he opposes annexation because he'd pay more in taxes and not receive any more services from Avondale Estates than he does from DeKalb County.

"We wouldn't be getting anything for our money," he said.

Also, Blalock said Avondale Estates "is not a very friendly place for business." He said most buildings in the unincorporated area are occupied, whereas downtown Avondale Estates is full of empty buildings.

Benfield and Drenner got the required 10 signatures on Monday that would allow them to introduce local legislation. A mass email from former Avondale Estates Mayor Pro Tem David Milliron was sent out as a call to action, saying

Success now depends on you. The small number of targeted property owners is organized, active and vocal in their opposition to annexation. Please speak out for the best interests of our City, take action and encourage your neighbors to do the same.

Several previous legislative efforts that would have allowed Avondale Estates to annex the land have failed.

ten March 14, 2012 at 02:35 PM
Funny how the business in that stretch that are well taken care of want the annexation. It is the dumps and falling down building owners that do not. What these businesses are doing is dragging down the neighborhood. Less revenue for the nice businesses and home owners property values. They need to shape up or move to an area that does not care. They do not seem to realize that we would patronage them if they were decent thus increasing there revenues. So yes, people would come if it did not look like a slum. That is a huge advantage.
Nick March 14, 2012 at 03:14 PM
Is it a chicken-or-the-egg thing? If the businesses had more revenue, could they invest more into making their businesses more attractive? If they are annexed, would the increase in taxes hurt their profit margin and overhead costs? Is the city hoping they are annexed, and then taxed out, so that they can rent/lease the vacated property to different tenants?
ten March 14, 2012 at 03:20 PM
Yes, But overall they are hurting other businesses and homeowners. The few might pay more but the big picture overall it would benefit many more property owners commercial and residential.
Nick March 14, 2012 at 08:33 PM
Duly noted! I hope all sides can come to a mutual agreement. And as you pointed out, if done properly, EVERYONE can benefit!
contented-NOT March 15, 2012 at 12:25 AM
Something good for businesses should come out of the annexation.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »